Oh, if it were only true - but it's not, Nabby. Grow up. MMY did his very best, to the very end, for the TMO to be as widely accepted, as soon as possible.
MMY was most comfortable with a tight grip, and his insecurity over the idea of loss of complete control precluded the best administrators the autonomy necessary for the greatest progress of the TMO. The long fall of the TMO, from the doorstep of wide acceptance, to its current irrelevancy, was not planned. No amount of rationalization along those lines makes any sense, except to further insulate the deluded from having to see MMY's own role in the TMO's demise. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_re...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 <no_reply@> > wrote: > >> > > i am still of the belief that no one ever got rich in the TM > > movement, that the TMO was, and is, chronically overextended, > > underfunded, and managed by the most devout vs. the most competent, > > to say the least. > > Whereas Maharishi could have picked the best administrators for His > Movement He consciously did not. In this way Maharishi was able to > steer the unfoldment of the Age of Enlightenment in the pace of His > liking; safe and steady. > > Please see Bob Brigantes posts. >
