--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > I recall being told that MMY had once been asked > > > why the Absolute had manifested, and he responded, > > > "Perhaps for the sake of variety?" > > > > > > On another occasion he was asked the same question. > > > His answer: "It didn't." > > > > Yes; I especially like the latter reply for its multivalence -- true > > at (at least) several "levels of consciousness" simultaneously. >From > > the Witness POV ("C.C.") the Absolute has nothing to do with the > > Relative; from Brahman's POV there *is* no Absolute and no > > Relative :-) > > Nor any POV either, however...
Hm? How so, given Brahman's tendency to collapse Wholeness into Point(s), hence POV ...? (Though technically this might be "Krishna" rather than "Brahman," I suppose.) It sounds more as if you are describing "T.C." rather than "Brahman," unless I am missing your point :-) To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
