On Jun 29, 2005, at 10:24 AM, anonymousff wrote: > To me, and my reaction may be tied to Peter's past style and tone, not > just his words, I felt Peter's comment was twisting Jerry's comment, > "I think it sums up the whole thing, doesn't". My take on his comment > was that 'well that settles it, you can't rely on ANY channeler'. I > realize it was my interpretation of tone, not the words themselves, > and in that I may have misteken his tone. > > While I am not a fan of channelers, I just felt such twisting was > uncalled for. So I asked the neutral and somehat humerous > extrapolation of his point, "And thus all chanellees are stupid?" ?" > My goal was to make him laugh and say, well no, I didn't really mean > to imply that.
I think he was just being his usual humorous, jovial and friendly self. Email's a dry communication medium. They say body communication is like 80+% of communication--take away body and voice inflection and there's very little left. So I place attention on that, being aware of that. Seems to help...some of the time : ) To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
