--- In [email protected], Vaj <vajradh...@...> wrote:
>
> On Feb 16, 2009, at 9:14 PM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
>
> > sounds like HH the DL describes the Maharishi as an
> > excellent and qualified teacher. good for him!
>
> Unfortunately for your skewed view of reality, it would
> not appear to be the case.
Unfortunately, it would appear to be the case
that it's Vaj's view of reality that's skewed...
> Errand boys and secretaries probably wouldn't fair so
> well in spiritual matters,
...but maybe that's because he's such a snob.
How about carpenters, Vaj? Would they "fair" [sic]
well in spiritual matters?
esp. as teachers possessing, at least,
> relative knowledge. One wonders how to classify "having
> sex with young members of the female gender" would fare
> in such a synopsis?
Oh, I don't think one wonders about this, do you?
If you
> can't meet the criteria of your "senses are
> controlled. Otherwise your senses will be like wild
> horses, pulling you into unfit actions", what does
> that mean about lusting after young kids
Notice how here Vaj fails to specify the gender or
the age of the "kids." With any luck, those who read
what he writes will think he means MMY was a
pedophile alleged to have preyed on prepubescent
boys, in addition to the young women he mentions
above.
Isn't that clever of Vaj?
> and acquiring palaces in Holland (or wherever)
Palaces?? Is Vaj referring to the old monastery
at Vlodrop?
to live in? And what's with the silk underwear?
> Is that meant to restrain your senses? Where would
> desire for world domination fall in all of this?
Where would it fall in his silk underwear?
("World domination." Hilarious.)
> Should we go through the criteria, one by one?
>
> I'd really enjoy that. Let's do it!
Oh, yes, let's! Why don't we start with this:
"If you cannot find anyone who has all of these
attributes, at least find someone who has more
good qualities than defects."
