On Feb 18, 2009, at 10:37 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote:
<snip>
YMMV.
So, obviously, does yours, Judy.
Please point us to the posts of yours in
which you have expressed "strong criticism"
of Nablus or ed11 when *they* belittled
Buddhists and Buddhism.
Are those not "personal beliefs and practices?"
Is this not equally reprehensible? WHY do they
"get a pass" and Vaj does not?
Possibly because they're *in response to* Vaj's
attacks on TM/MMY/TMers? Nablus and ed11 didn't
initiate the attacks, you see, Vaj did.
If he doesn't want his beliefs to be attacked,
there's an easy solution: Don't attack ours.
This is an interesting point to me. It is a hard line to walk making
some of these distinctions.
That's because they're idiotic, Curtis. Judy's simply
using the "he did it first!" excuse, beloved by people
under the age of 10, but usually avoided,
even if only out of embarrassment, by those oder.
Which really just goes to prove the old maxim:
You're only young once, but you can be immature
forever.
Way to go, Judy. This has got to be one of her
dumbest arguments yet.
Sal
