--- In [email protected], "boo_lives" <boo_li...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > I'm not a "tmo TB" by any stretch, although I > > suspect you're including me here. > > No I don't. You use a different language generally > and you use more objective logic.
Thank you. In fact my guess is that if you were to actually > work for the tmo for a couple yrs you might get > into trouble. My guess too. One reason I never tried! > I guess I would consider you a theoretical TM-SCI TB Pretty close. I no longer remember how much of SCI deals with issues other than the nature and mechanics of consciousness, but as I said to Curtis, the N&M of consciousness is the only aspect of MMY's teaching I'm committed to (and that only as my working hypothesis). , which is just > fine, except I don't think actual life and > practice within the tmo community has much to > do with TM or MMY's thinking a la the early 70s. >From what I read and hear, I'd have to concur, sadly.
