--- In [email protected], off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Consider FFL. Those who criticize Maharishi are > > often labeled as "anti-TMer's." Are they?>>> > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote:
> Yes, they are anti-TM'rs. What? Are you serious? Does being an adherent of TM or overall proponent of TM preclude the possibility of all critical thought? If you were on a bhakti path this *might* make sense, I suppose. However, I always found that God/the Divine responds far better to absolute *honesty* -- communicating whatever is actually in my heart, even if it be full of anger and criticism and other so-called "negativity" -- than S/He ever did to a hypocritical self-denial and "politeness" for politeness' sake. There is a word for ignoring one's deep truth; it's called "ignorance." :-) Truth -- one's personal truth of the moment -- is the carrier-wave of Love. Hence my deep love for Llundrub -- no matter how ugly it might *appear* to be, he was generally vulnerable and honest to his Truth of the moment. This is supremely loveable. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
