--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <lengli...@...> wrote:

> 
> And "effort" is certainly misleading because even "intent" is too harsh a 
> word.
> 
> 
> L.


By the time you are intending that the mantra comes from a body part in an 
advanced technique, this discussion breaks down.  As I said in my previous 
part, it seems pretty difficult for people to apply the kind of effort in 
meditation that Maharishi is making such a big deal about.  I only encountered 
it very rarely in checking TM.  But within that basic relaxation approach, 
there is also quite a bit of leeway as we know from the sidhi techniques or 
even the Age of Enlightenment technique. If you have ever hung out with people 
in a hypnosis classes, they can do an Age of E  type of technique right off the 
bat with the same imagined results TMers report.  It is unnatural for people to 
apply headache inducing effort with internal relaxation techniques.


>
> --- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote:
> >
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> > On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
> > Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2009 1:21 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Who's a TM teacher? (Re: Free Web Event:
> > McCartney/Lynch)
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > According to Rick the Vedas says "Be easy to the meditators with gentle
> > effort". 
> > 
> > I didn't make up the quote. I'm quoting Maharishi verbatim. He repeated the
> > quote many times in that lecture and it isn't a long one - "Be easy to us
> > with gentle effort" - so it's not hard to remember accurately. Interpret it
> > how you will, but Maharishi was very clear in explaining that there is a
> > sort of effort involved in TM, but that it is so gentle or subtle that
> > "effort" is not the appropriate word to describe it, and that using that
> > word would be misleading and probably cause people to overdo it. Perhaps
> > Cardemeister can find the actual passage Maharishi was quoting, and we can
> > see what it means in its original context.
> >
> 
> 
> And "effort" is certainly misleading because even "intent" is too harsh a 
> word.
> 
> 
> L.
>


Reply via email to