--- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>  
> In a message dated 7/2/05 9:44:13 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> Phonies  huh? 
> 1. Were there WMD's in Iraq?
> 2. Were there an Al Quaida  Iraq?
> 3. Did the Reagan/Bush administration support and turn a blind 
eye  
> to Saddam gassing the Iranian army. (The one on the Kurds was just 
> one  that went astray.) There were daily gassings by Saddam 
against  
> Iran....with FULL support of Reagan/Bush  administration.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 1 Yes there were, he used them didn't he? We just don't know  
exactly when 
> they were removed or destroyed. Even the New York Times published 
a  story that 
> the Russians came in a cleaned up the WMD for Saddam as France  
Germany and 
> Russia stalled for time while debating the issue in the UN. But 
hey,  even I 
> take with a grain of salt what the NYT  
prints.                                   
>        2. Al Qaida and other terrorists, well known terrorists, 
have had safe 
> passage  in and out of Iraq since the 90's if not earlier. Iraqi 
intelligence 
> officers  have been known to meet with members of Al Qaida and 
other 
> terrorists as well.  Zarqawi moved his base of operations from 
Afghanistan too Iraq 
> after we invaded  Afghanistan and before any mention of invading 
Iraq occurred 
> and Saddam didn't  stop him from coming to his  
country.                        
>                        3. Reagan and Bush never supported the 
gassing of 
> anybody! As I recall they  protested his use of gas before the UN. 
They did 
> support Saddam with military  intelligence to keep Iran from 
beating him in the war 
> and keep Iranian  revolution from spreading to other nations in 
the  region.

 It has always seemed to me that the whole reason for the Iraq 
invasion was to establish permanent military bases there. If along 
the way way the Iraqi people ended up with a better life, well, all 
the better but not the point of the whole exercise. 

Is there any plan to remove all military presence from Iraq, ever? I 
don't think so, in fact I've heard that the main sticking point with 
designing a new Iraqi government is just that issue.

Do groups like Al Qaeda dislike us so vehemently because they are 
all insane religous zeolots who hate christians and the western life 
style and it's "freedoms"? Or does it have something to do with our 
military bases in Saudi Arabia and now in Iraq?

This invasion of Iraq was such a perfect move because there are an 
infinite number of ways that it can be justified as essential for 
the safety of the American people and if that doesn't work then at 
least it is for the good of the poor downtrodden Iraqi's. 

Top Ten reasons to invade Iraq:

1. UN inspections weren't working.

2. WMD. 

3. Sadam Hussein gassed his own people.

4. WMD.

5. Bring democracy to the Iraqi people.

6. WMD

7. Sadam is a personal friend of Osama Bin Laden.

8. Thats where the terrorists live.

9. They flew into the World Trade buildings.

10. It's to goddamn late, we're there and we aint leavin', besides,
    if we did leave, the terrorists would all get together
    and kill the American people and look at how much better off
    the Iraqis are and why don't you support our troops you liberal 
    commie bastards.


Rick Carlstrom




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to