--- In [email protected], "geezerfreak" <geezerfr...@...> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "geezerfreak" <geezerfreak@> wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > Judy, he didn't "pretend" it was about ice cream. It
> > > WAS about ice cream!
> > 
> > If you say so. As I noted, my thought that it was about
> > your leaving the hotel at night was a function of
> > Barry's errors concerning the frequency and time of day.
> > 
> > Did they ever say what the problem was with eating ice
> > cream? And were you allowed to leave the hotel for
> > other reasons, just not for ice cream?
> > 
> > ('Cause, see, what Barry's so hot under the collar about
> > is its being against the rules to leave the course
> > facility. I think he'd be relieved if he could switch to
> > being hot under the collar about its being against the
> > rules to eat ice cream, so you'd be doing him a favor if
> > you were to elaborate convincingly on that.)
> >
> No, the whole point was that I had gone off site to 
> get the coup Denmark. I thought I made that clear...

Sheesh. But that's what I was saying Barry was
pretending about--that it was about eating ice
cream, when it was actually about going off-site,
even in the middle of the day once a week!

So I was right, he *was* pretending it was about
ice cream, because that made a better story.

It's a shame you guys didn't get an afternoon a
week or something to roam around and see the sights
and buy things. Waste of a good European trip, I'd
say.


Reply via email to