--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], enlightened_dawn11 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > in other words Doug, your boxes are silly, trivial > > and even incorrect. Turqy's boxes, on the other hand, > > are accurate, thoughtful and definitive. > > > > does anyone else see that Turqy is setting himself up > > as the one true enlightened being on FFL? sure he > > decrys the term, but behind the false humility and > > psuedo non-attachment, he thinks what he says and > > thinks trumps anyone else here. Why? because he is a > > spiritual aspirant like no other- he transcends > > (ignores) everything but his own perspective-- no > > contradiction stands in his way- why? because he alone > > knows and lives the transcendental reality, making him > > de facto master over the rest of us. > > Yup, well put. > > He's a fundamentally a solipsist, as I keep > pointing out, arranging his personal reality so > that he always comes out on top, at least in > his own mind (which is all it takes, because the > rest of us don't exist except as a function of > his mental processes). He's a self-sustaining > closed loop, completely self- (as opposed to > Self-) referential.
Again, Doug, do you see the advantage of my boxes over yours? Yours only divide the world into "meditators" and "non-meditators," whereas mine break down the "meditators" into easily-identifiable sub- categories. For example, trying to use big words to sound intellectual instead of pissed off is a dead giveaway.
