There is a lesson here for TM slimeball lawyers
who threaten TM-Free and others who dare to speak
freely about the TM movement.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/05/29/wikipedia_bans_scientology/

In an unprecedented effort to crack down on self-serving 
edits, the Wikipedia supreme court has banned contributions 
from all IP addresses owned or operated by the Church of 
Scientology and its associates.

Closing out the longest-running court case in Wikiland 
history, the site's Arbitration Committee voted 10 to 0 
(with one abstention) in favor of the move, which takes 
effect immediately.

The eighth most popular site on the web, Wikipedia bills 
itself as "the free encyclopedia anyone can edit." 
Administrators frequently ban individual Wikifiddlers 
for their individual Wikisins. And the site's UK press officer/resident goth 
once silenced an entire Utah 
mountain in a bizarre attempt to protect a sockpuppeting 
ex-BusinessWeek reporter. But according to multiple 
administrators speaking with The Reg, the muzzling of 
Scientology IPs marks the first time Wikipedia has 
officially barred edits from such a high-profile 
organization for allegedly pushing its own agenda 
on the site.

The Church of Scientology has not responded to our 
request for comment.

Officially, Wikipedia frowns on those who edit "in order 
to promote their own interests." The site sees itself as 
an encyclopedia with a "neutral point of view" - whatever 
that is. "Use of the encyclopedia to advance personal 
agendas – such as advocacy or propaganda and philosophical, 
ideological or religious dispute – or to publish or promote 
original research is prohibited," say the Wikipowersthatbe.

Admins may ban a Wikifiddler who betrays an extreme conflict 
of interest, and since fiddlers often hide their identity 
behind open proxies, such IPs may be banned as a preventative 
measure. After today's ruling from the Arbitration Committee - 
known in Orwellian fashion as the ArbCom - Scientology IPs 
are "to be blocked as if they were open proxies" (though 
individual editors can request an exemption).

According to evidence turned up by admins in this long-
running Wikiland court case, multiple editors have been 
"openly editing [Scientology-related articles] from Church 
of Scientology equipment and apparently coordinating their 
activities." Leaning on the famed WikiScanner, countless 
news stories have discussed the editing of Scientology 
articles from Scientology IPs, and some site admins are 
concerned this is "damaging Wikipedia's reputation for 
neutrality."

One admin tells The Reg that policing edits from Scientology 
machines has been particularly difficult because myriad 
editors sit behind a small number of IPs and, for some 
reason, the address of each editor is constantly changing. 
This prevents admins from determining whether a single 
editor is using multiple Wikipedia accounts to game the 
system. In Wikiland, such sockpuppeting is not allowed.

The Wikicourt considered banning edits from Scientology 
IPs only on Scientology-related articles. But this would 
require admins to "checkuser" editors - i.e. determine 
their IP - every time an edit is made. And even then they 
may not know who's who.

"Our alternatives are to block them entirely, or checkuser 
every 'pro-Scientology' editor on this topic. I find the 
latter unacceptable," wrote one ArbComer. "It is quite 
broad, but it seems that they're funneling a lot of 
editing traffic through a few IPs, which make socks 
impossible to track."

And it may be a moot point. Most the editors in question 
edit nothing but Scientology-related articles. In 
Wikiparlance, they're "single purpose accounts."

Some have argued that those editing from Scientology IPs 
may be doing so without instruction from the Church 
hierarchy. But a former member of Scientology's Office 
of Special Affairs - a department officially responsible 
"for directing and coordinating all legal matters 
affecting the Church" - says the Office has organized 
massive efforts to remove Scientology-related materials 
and criticism from the web.

"The guys I worked with posted every day all day," Tory 
Christman tells The Reg. "It was like a machine. I worked 
with someone who used five separate computers, five 
separate anonymous identities...to refute any facts 
from the internet about the Church of Scientology."

Christman left the Church in 2000, before Wikipedia was 
created.

This is the fourth Scientology-related Wikicourtcase in 
as many years, and in addition to an outright ban on 
Scientology IPs, the court has barred a host of anti-
Scientology editors from editing topics related to 
the Church.

Many Wikifiddlers have vehemently criticized this sweeping 
crackdown. Historically, the site's cult-like inner circle 
has aspired to some sort of Web 2.0 utopia in which 
everyone has an unfettered voice. An organization 
editing Wikipedia articles where it has a conflict of 
interest is hardly unusual, and in the past such behavior 
typically went unpunished.

But clearly, Wikipedia is changing. In recent months, the 
site's ruling body seems far more interested in quashing 
at least the most obvious examples of propaganda pushing.

Scientology's banishment from Wikipedia comes just days 
after the opening of a (real world) trial that could see 
the dissolution of the organization's French chapter.



Reply via email to