"Life may have no meaning. Or even worse, it may have a meaning 
of which I disapprove."  - Ashleigh Brilliant 

I'm not quite sure who or what Ashleigh Brilliant is,
or was, but I catch his meaning, and I approve.

One of the main differences I perceive between the TM
view of life and its possible "meaning" or "purpose"
and that of other spiritual traditions I tend to prefer
is that TMers -- on the whole -- seem illcontent with
Life As It Is, whereas many other spiritual seekers
do not. 

Strong Buddhists and Taoists I've met seem content 
with Here And Now, and do their best to make the best 
of what Here And Now presents them. In contrast, if 
you look even at the sampling of "TM thought" we see
on this forum, many if not most of the things said 
about the world by its adherents are anything *but*
content with Here And Now. They're more about long-
ing for "someday" and all that mythical "someday"
promises. If they're more blissed-out, "someday"
becomes "Any day now." But it's still not Here And
Now...it's always off in some theoretical future.

And the import of "Any day now" is that things are
"not right" Here And Now. There is an assumption that
the world they perceive around them is *broken*, "not
right," and that they must do something -- anything --
to CHANGE that world, or change themselves, to make 
both of them "right."

This early morning in Sitges, watching the street
cleaners do their thing from this cafe table, I find
myself underwhelmed by this tendency to view the world
as something that "needs work" because it doesn't live
up to their fantasies about what it should be, and to 
disapprove of it and reject it as beneath them *until*
it lives up to their fantasies.

Sitges is a tourist town. Tourists -- especially young
tourists and even more especially English tourists, of
whom we get more than our fair share -- tend to get 
rowdy and drunk on a Saturday night. Thus if one wakes
up early on a Sunday morning and strolls out to find a
cafe in which to have a nice cuppa java, one finds the
street full of crap. Litter, bottles, paper fast-food
wrappings and occasionally even real crap. The streets
look as if thousands of people had been so wrapped up
in having a good time that they just threw their crap
anywhere they felt like throwing it. And, of course,
looking at the streets, there is no doubt that this 
is litter-ally true.

And then the street cleaners spring into action. Sitges
has the best street cleaning crews in the world. At 08:00
the streets are a mess; by 09:00 they are clean and pris-
tine and scrubbed as clean as if no one had ever walked
on them. 

There is no question that the world *appears* better 
after the street cleaners have done their thing. It is
aesthetically more pleasing. But is it really any "better?"
Does the street have more Buddha-nature or Tao or Brahman
or God to it after a good sweeping and scrubbing than it
did before? I think not. I think that God (if I believed
in such a fictional entity) was as present in the dirty
streets of Sitges on my walk to this cafe as it will be
in the clean streets of Sitges as I walk home.

Superficially, the streets look "better." Superficially,
Fairfield, Iowa looks to some like "Heaven On Earth."
Superficially, if you bounce on your butt with other butt-
bouncers before reading the morning papers, the world is
"better" as a result of you doing so. Superficially.

But the world really doesn't give much of a shit about
your puny notions of "better" or "worse," of "right" and
"just not right yet." The world just is.

It's been my experience that the people who have gained
some sense of comfort with *how* it is in the Here And
Now are happier than those who have not, those who are 
always seeking some mythical Then when things will all 
be "better." That does not mean that these people do not 
spend some of their time as metaphorical street cleaners,
trying to make Here And Now more pleasant for themselves 
and other people, only that their sense of self and 
their sense of "meaning" DOES NOT DEPEND on that 
mythical "better."

They are them-selves in the litter of post-Saturday night
reveling, and they are them-selves in the pristine clean-
liness of a tourist town pretending that it's always
litter-free. They have the ability to appreciate the
Buddha-nature of Here And Now *in* the Here And Now, 
and not constantly live in hope of some mythical Then. 

Life as TMers wish for it might be neat, although I 
suspect that their vision of "Heaven On Earth" would be 
(in the words of Leonard Cohen) "as boring as heaven on 
a Saturday night." I suspect that the real heaven, if 
one exists, has a few street cleaning crews of its own, 
and that they're as busy Sunday mornings cleaning up 
after night-before revelers as the street cleaning 
crews of Sitges are. I *hope* that the denizens of 
heaven "party down" from time to time, and don't just 
sit around playing harps and polishing their haloes. 
And I *certainly* hope that the residents of the real 
heaven, if one exists, have gotten over that infantile 
wishing for something "better," some future life that 
has more "meaning," or that better fits their fantasies 
about Then, fantasies that keep them from appreciating 
Here And Now -- Life As It Is.

Because really...what are they going to fantasize about
once they're in heaven, eh? 

A "better" heaven? Heaven, release 2.0? 



Reply via email to