--- In [email protected], Vaj <vajradh...@...> wrote:
>
> 
> On Jun 9, 2009, at 10:55 AM, sparaig wrote:
> 
> >> At the Harvard conference on meditation last month, Herbert Benson
> >> listed 8 meditation techniques that have the same physiological
> >> signature:
> >>
> >> Vipassana Meditation
> >> Mantra Meditation
> >> Mindfulness Meditation
> >> Transcendental Meditation
> >> Breath Focus
> >> Kripalu Yoga
> >> Kundalini Yoga
> >> Repetitive Prayer
> >>
> >> So much for "uniqueness", huh?
> >>
> >> The uniqueness lie is a marketing myth used by disreputable and
> >> biased TM researchers to push their product. Apparently they're the
> >> only ones who believe this. Other researchers know better than to
> >> accept such BS. The independent research "Meditation: In Search of a
> >> Unique Effect" put this and a number of other TM research untruths to
> >> rest way back in the 80's!
> >>
> >
> > So, by physiological signature, he was discussing breath suspension
> > of up to 1 minute, 5x during a 10 minute meditation period?
> >
> > Where's the research to back this up?
> 
> 
> I don't believe any of them consider these TM-induced apneas  
> significant. 

Well Benson is the one claiming that TM's physiological signature is the
same as the RR, not I.

You keep bringing this up again and again, like you're  
> still having a hard time letting go of this. It's an interesting  
> chosen artifact, but that's about it. Experientially, from my own  
> experience of breath cessation during TM, it does not represent  
> anything worthwhile. I'd agree with Austin on this, at best it  
> represents the shallow preludes of samadhi.

You think its supposed to be something special? Something striking?
Something NOTEWORTHY!!!???

Earth to Vaj: if its a sign of samadhi, you won't even notice it.

> 
> Reductions in metabolic rate however, as recorded by Benson of 60  
> some per cent is very significant--the highest drop ever recorded in  
> humans.
>

Interesting stuff. But, has he replicated it back at Harvard, especially with
non-monks?


L.


Reply via email to