--- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <r...@...> wrote: >
> > When you die ? It has already happened; a person dedicated to slandering > Saints is already "enjoying" his karma. > Just came back from seeing one. Sri Karunamayi. Nice experience. Nothing > about her to attract slander. > > While you're at it, tell us what happened to Rama, Lakshman, > > and Sita after they died. When they were in exile, they shot and ate deer. > > But not frogs. > 'Cause there's not much meat on them. But you still haven't told us why > eating them is such a sin. Do the Vedas say so? Maitreya? Or is this one of > your own personal edicts? Your problem is that you do not have access to any real Saints anymore because they will never again take you seriously after all the slandering you have committed. You don't have a real Saint to ask this question to and never will, but I will answer it on behalf of them based on what several Saints have said and written: If you eat a Frog you will spend time in intense Tamas after having left the body. If you ate a Frog not being aware of their sacred status you will still have to experience intense Tamas for a while (and so will I) but it will not be very long, just "longish". If you in your hippe-days ate a Frog, it will not harm you much since you did not know the sacred status of Frogs. I ate two Frog-legs myself in San Fransisco in 1969 and womitted afterwards, not knowing anything about the sacred status of Frogs (I was 13 years old). But if you today as much as think of eating one you'll be in big trouble. Not that you're not in big trouble already for slandering Saints and Yogis.
