--- In [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> , "shempmcgurk" <shempmcg...@...>
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> , off_world_beings <no_reply@>
wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> , Vaj <vajradhatu@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Jul 4, 2009, at 2:03 AM, cardemaister wrote:
> > >
> > > > 1. Great Britain
> > >
> > >
> > > Worry not, the Religion of Peace has established as many as 85
Sharia
> > > Courts to bring coherence to Great Britain:
> > >
> > > 85 Sharia courts now operating in Britain
> > > According to the think tank Civitas, "Among the rulings ... we
find
> > > some that advise illegal actions and others that transgress human
> > > rights standards as they are applied by British courts.">>
> >
> > This is stupid. You are being brainwashed by the media. There are
> > Christian church courts in the USA that enforce rules on their
> > congregation. A few even advise illegal action. It is just the
minority
> > though...not the norm.
> >
> > The ancient egalatarian keltic society in Britain is invincible. It
> > cannot be wetted, it cannot be burned, it can be dried up, it cannot
be
> > destroyed. A few outliers are just the natural accepted cost of
freedom.
> > And don't forget, Britain has been a free country a lot longer than
the
> > USA has.
> >
> > OffWorld
> >
>
>
> The way that I understood the Sharia court to work as a result of
Vaj's post is that they would have the force of law.
>
> Is that not correct?>>

Of course not. Get real. Only gangsters break the law with their own
laws.

> If it is correct then, certainly, that would be bypassing the current
court system?
>
> Of course, if the Sharia court is only for civil matters and people
freely enter into a binding sort of agreement -- the way people do with
arbitrators -- then, yes, it would just be an extension of a system that
already is in place in America.>

Er, Britain is not like America. It is not so easy to be held by some
binding agreement when it comes to human rights.

OffWorld


Reply via email to