--- In [email protected], t3rinity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It's interesting. I have never viewed TM as "conditioning," but > > rather as counter-conditioning. > > Counter-conditioning is also conditioning > > > In fact, and yes, this could be my > > own blindness to conditioning coming through, but my "experience" > > with TM is such that I can't even conceive (or even admit to save in > > words strung together in a script that I'm reading, rather than > > feeling/meaining) that there is an "easier" "technique" than TM. > > I think I can really relate to what you are saying Lawson. My point > is not so much the 'experience' you have, which I know very much. > Its everything else, which the mind spins around it. The > experience, in all its purity, is embedded in some theory, which is > justified by the 'experience'. In your mind, the theory you have > about meditation is so inevitably connected with the experience, > that you can't see how it could be wrong, or how there could be > other alternatives.
What's the "it" in your last sentence, Michael, the experience or the theory? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
