--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Nelson" <nelsonriddle2...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Nelson" <nelsonriddle2001@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Nelson" <nelsonriddle2001@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I was thinking of the federal level- where many > > > > > advocate a total ban. > > > > > > > > I don't think so. I doubt anyone in Congress advocates > > > > a total ban on guns. Many are in favor of various types > > > > of gun control, but not a total ban by any stretch. > > > > > > > > And there are at least as many in Congress who vigorously > > > > oppose most if not all gun-control measures. > > > > > > We have a Mr. Koh involved who is a globalist that thinks > > > we should be run by the UN. > > > > Well, not exactly. > > > > > The UN has some bizzare ideas on soverin nations. > > > The international CIFTA treaty which has some support > > > here is a total disaster in the making. > > > > It'll never pass the Senate. > > > > And you still haven't come close to backing up your > > original claims. > > > OK, I'll try to weasel out of it by saying that I should > have said that was my impression from what I had read > rather than an absolute fact.
OK, happens to the best of us! Hopefully you won't be quite so trusting of the sources that gave you that impression in the future...
