--- In [email protected], anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > I just helped circulate that in another post. > > > > > > It is ambiguous, but I am not sure which slant was meant. > > > > I just *told* you which "slant" was meant. > > Well I guess that solves it then. Case closed. > > I have just had a revleation. Life will be so much easier if I just > always get the truth straight from Judy. > > > Don't let your mind be so open your brains > > fall out. You've been doing that a lot > > lately. > > I suppose cults could use the same reasoning. > > > > The "by > > > definition" "proof" isn't definative IMO. > > > > What are you talking about? "By definition" > > refers to what he meant, it has nothing to do > > with "proof." Read what I wrote again, please. > > > I did read it again. And again it appears to me that you make the same > mistake that a lot of smart people make.
One sentence, out of context, and you're both arguing about who is smarter. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
