--- In [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> , "ShempMcGurk" <shempmcg...@...>
wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> , off_world_beings <no_reply@>
wrote:
>
> >
> > Unfortunately for BillyG, Pali, and Shemp, the scientific evidence
is
> > overwhelmingly on the side of the evils of pollution.
>
>
> [snip]
>
>
> I can't speak for BillyG or Pali but I oppose "pollution" as much as
the next guy. >>
So you are on our side and you don't even know it !
And not from some "scientific evidence" standpoint but one of common
sense. Pollution smells, it is obviously clogging up the air in a city
(something easy to see in the Phoenix area when you hike up a mountain
which I often do), and is not nice to breath.
>
> But CO2 is NOT -- I repeat NOT -- a pollutant>
Methane is a pollutant and is a massive greenhouse gas. CO2 is a
pollutant also, because pollutants bind to it and persist in the
atmosphere, building up when they should be released. Go study the
geo-history of Venus Shemp. Get back to me when you're done.
I am glad to hear you are on our side now Shemp. If you are
anti-atmosphere, then you are a pollutionist.
OffWorld
