off_world_beings wrote: > That is a British rag that is one > step above The National Inquirer... > And one step lower than off_world? LOL! "Attempts to manipulate peer reviews and journal acceptances are not acceptable scientific activities.
Withholding key scientific data can only make one question their dedication to scientific principles. Hiding their alleged destruction of the basic temperature data that would allow reconstruction of what they have done is almost as bad as discarding such critical data in the first place. Using data that cannot be reproduced is not very useful scientifically, or from a regulatory viewpoint..." 'Climategate Will Now Hit the EPA' http://tinyurl.com/ycndhtt > > "THE scientific consensus that mankind has > > caused climate change was rocked yesterday > > as a leading academic called it a 'load of > > hot air underpinned by fraud'..." > > > > 'CLIMATE CHANGE 'FRAUD' > > By John Ingham > > Daily Express, December 2, 2009 > > http://tinyurl.com/y9hxyyv
