--- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <do.rf...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "raunchydog" <raunchydog@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote: > > > > > > It's quite clear to me by the emotionally charged venom > > > you consistently throw out at Obama and the Obama > > > administration that you're quite a bit more than over > > > the top in the anger and bitterness dept, Ms Dog - and > > > because of it it appears to me that reason has little > > > place in your perspective. > > > > > > Everything you've said since Hillary lost shows you > > > made up your mind [and your heart] against Obama from > > > the beginning. > > > > > > Well, life goes on... doesn't it. > > > > I'm pissed because I'm informed. If I ignored the facts > > like you do, I could be blasé about Obama's lack of > > spine as well. I'm passionate about my politics because > > I care what happens to my country. I pay close attention > > to what the pols say and do everyday. This is not just > > about Obama. If you paid better attention you would know > > we've been screwed by the Democrats on health care > > reform, by the banks, by Wall Street, by the insurance > > industry, and by big oil and the military in Afghanistan. > > I hold Obama responsible for his lack of leadership, you > > don't. That's where we differ. I won't roll over for the > > Democrats ever again. Where as O-bomb-ya will still be > > screwing you blue into 2012 and you will still stupidly > > vote for him again. By the way this has nothing to do > > with Hillary. I'm just laying out the facts for you. > > Plug your ears and sing la la la, if you don't like it. > > I stand by what I've said above and what I said in my > previous post.
Let's look at what the do.rkflex said in his previous post: > > > Then by all means vote against Obama and for a Republican > > > in 2012, Ms Dog. > > > > > > However, I really don't think that your 'Champion' > > > Hillary, who's adamantly said she's not running again > > > herself, will join you. Nothing but ad hominem, in that post and the one Raunchy responds to above. And not only ad hominem, but STOOOOOOOPID ad hominem. Raunchy never suggested she'd vote for a Republican in 2012. do.rkflex FAIL. And OF COURSE Hillary isn't going to vote for a Republican. Complete non sequitur. do.rkflex FAIL. Nor did Hillary "adamantly" say she isn't running again. do.rkflex FAIL. And from above: > > > reason has little place in your perspective This after Raunchy has gone into quite some detail as to the reasons she thinks Obama and the Democrats have failed. Did the do.rkflex advance anything of substance to counter Raunchy's reasoning? Of course not. do.rkflex FAIL. Plus which, he focuses entirely on Obama, when Raunchy's made it clear as can be it's not just Obama but the Democrats in general who haven't delivered. do.rkflex FAIL. He said above: > > > the emotionally charged venom > > > you consistently throw out at Obama and the Obama > > > administration Raunchy has, in fact, consistently given Obama credit for the things he's done that she approves of. Shall we think about the emotionally charged venom the do.rkflex has consistently thrown out at Bush, at Hillary, at Palin, at Raunchy (and me), and at anybody else he disagrees with about *anything*? do.rkflex FAIL. He said above: > > > Everything you've said since Hillary lost Raunchy says explicitly her outrage over what the Dems and Obama are doing has NOTHING TO DO WITH HILLARY. The do.rk keeps bringing up Hillary in his attempts to discredit Raunchy *because he has nothing substantive* to respond to her criticisms. do.rkflex FAIL. And now he says he stands by everything he's said in his two previous posts, when in fact the only thing he's said that was accurate is that "life goes on." Wow, breaking news. do.kflex FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL. What a LOSER.
