--- In [email protected], "raunchydog" <raunchy...@...> wrote: <snip> > I watched Greer's video. The thing that I found fascinating > about it was his claim that he can "vector" them in, make > them arrive at a certain location, communicate with them > with his consciousness and train people to do this. I'd like > to see him do this in Fairfield. We could sell tickets as a > fund raiser like we did for the Beach Boys' concert this > summer. David Lynch should sign on for it. Seriously, I'd > really like to see a demonstration of his vectoring abilities.
Sheesh, that's all the TMO needs! I have no idea what it is Greer is doing, but I seriously doubt it's what he *thinks* he's doing. This is where I suspect the fantasies kick in. > I'm easily swayed by conspiracy theories so I'm inclined > to believe his claims about the existence of Unacknowledged > Special Access Programs, covert activities of a "shadow > government" so secret that even Bill Clinton and his CIA > guys were forbidden access to information about UFO's. > Apparently Greer met with the Clintons and his CIA director > about getting access to the USAP but they thought it was too > dangerous to force disclosure. Perhaps Greer stretches > credulity at this point but I'm still willing to give him > the benefit of the doubt. My credulity doesn't stretch that far. I doubt he "met with the Clintons." Representatives, at best. I don't believe the president and the CIA were "forbidden access" to anything. I think that's his interpretation of whatever it was they *did* say. Just as a common-sense matter, if it were true, they wouldn't have told *him* that, for pete's sake. If anybody ever actually said it was "too dangerous," what they meant was, "We don't know what the f*ck is going on here, and it would be dangerous for us to admit that we weren't on top of everything." I'm suspicious of anybody who isn't utterly confounded by the evidence, such as it is. The more you know, the less comprehensible it becomes. > Greer implies he has been in contact with the Obama > administration about disclosing UFO secrets. "In contact with" can mean anything. It could mean he sent them a letter and got a form response back. I really didn't find Greer convincing (although, as I said, I missed about the middle third of his presentation--maybe I'll go back and watch again and try to stay awake through the whole thing.) Interestingly, at St. Gabes on Christmas Eve Father Tom, in the context of a sermon he gave about religious diversity said that the Vatican recently announced it had an interest in a scientific and religious dialogue about the implications of extraterrestrial life. So I Googled the topic and found an article that seems to support Greer's claim that Obama administration and the UN desire to disclose information about UFO's but military agencies such as the British Ministry of Defence (MOD) want to shut it down. > > "In an apparent set back for secret official efforts to announce the > existence of extraterrestrial life, the British Ministry of Defence (MOD) has > just closed its UFO desk. After 50 years of having an official reporting > mechanism in place for public sightings of UFOs, a spokesman for the Ministry > of Defence stated that the funds could be better used for the Afghanistan > war. What is the impact of the British MOD decision to close its UFO desk? > Why was such an announcement made now given that only a trivial amount of > public funds (44,000 pounds/US$73,000 a year) will be saved on an issue that > generates strong public passion? Is this a simple administrative decision on > an issue that genuinely involves no national security factor; or a cynical > move by a powerful British based national security faction to influence > and/or impede coordinated international efforts to disclose the existence of > extraterrestrial life?" > > Read more: > http://snipurl.com/tuy3u > http://www.examiner.com/x-2383-Honolulu-Exopolitics-Examiner~y2009m12d5-British-MOD-closes-UFO-desk--impact-on-extraterrestrial-disclosure
