--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote:
>
> Seven (293 to go). From here on, I'll collect and
> count your substance-free obsessive posts under the
> "Dances with Obsession" heading in one post at the
> end of each week. (And I'm not, of course, counting
> just the ones with the word "slattern" in them.)

Ahem.

One could as easily count the instances of "do.rkflex"
used by Judy The Slattern Hunter.

Even given the braindead Yahoo Search mechanism, those
appear to already exceed the number of instances of
"slattern" by a factor of 10. Maybe more.

Again, it's *OK* for Judy to constantly use a belittling
name for one of her "enemies," but if I keep bringing up
a word *that clearly does not refer to her* because she
hasn't got enough hair *for* it to get "unkempt," that's 
bad.

Count away, Jude. Using my own tactics against me 
(remember how I used to document the number of times
you knowingly violated the Posting Limit before a
penalty was created for doing so?) just won't work,
because I DON'T GIVE A SHIT. 

You do.

YOU are the one who can be continually baited into 
"defending yourself," because *you have so much self
to defend*. Me, not so much. I wouldn't give a shit
what Buddha said about me were he to start posting
from beyond the grave. 

And I *like* the Buddha, and respect him. Why should 
I care what *you* say?  :-)


Reply via email to