Ten (290 to go):

--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> >
> > Seven (293 to go). From here on, I'll collect and
> > count your substance-free obsessive posts under the
> > "Dances with Obsession" heading in one post at the
> > end of each week. (And I'm not, of course, counting
> > just the ones with the word "slattern" in them.)
> 
> Ahem.
> 
> One could as easily count the instances of "do.rkflex"
> used by Judy The Slattern Hunter.
> 
> Even given the braindead Yahoo Search mechanism, those
> appear to already exceed the number of instances of
> "slattern" by a factor of 10. Maybe more.

You must have misread what I wrote. Try it again.

> Again, it's *OK* for Judy to constantly use a belittling
> name for one of her "enemies," but if I keep bringing up
> a word *that clearly does not refer to her* because she
> hasn't got enough hair *for* it to get "unkempt," that's 
> bad.

What I'm counting is all the posts of yours triggered
by my original post on McDonnnell's hair, not just
your posts that use the word "slattern," whether 
it refers to me or not.

BTW, I will not count any posts of yours on that issue
that make a rational argument, without demonization,
proposing a different explanation for the incongruity.

(And I have more than enough hair to get unkempt. 
Remember the one you like so much you've reposted it
over and over, even at one point Photoshopping it to
look like a crop circle?)

> Count away, Jude. Using my own tactics against me 
> (remember how I used to document the number of times
> you knowingly violated the Posting Limit before a
> penalty was created for doing so?)

Nope, I never knowingly violated the posting limit.

> just won't work, because I DON'T GIVE A SHIT. 
> 
> You do.
> 
> YOU are the one who can be continually baited into 
> "defending yourself," because *you have so much self
> to defend*.

It's never been a matter of defending myself. It's
a matter of documenting what a thoroughly crappy
human being you are (which I do no matter whom or
what you're attacking, as I suspect you've noticed).

 Me, not so much. I wouldn't give a shit
> what Buddha said about me were he to start posting
> from beyond the grave.

Says Barry, vigorously defending himself.

Actually it's about the number of posts you're
throwing away as a function of your insane rage over
the McDonnell issue. You estimated it would be 300
posts. Let's see how far you get.



Reply via email to