--- In [email protected], Peter Sutphen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], > > off_world_beings > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > You mean like Rick did with Maharishi? (Maharishi > > who is obviously > > > beloved by his friend). A friend does not go > > around saying "your > > > wife is a slut and a whore" for example, > > especially with zero > > > evidence. > > > > Did you read the same article I did? In the article > > I read, Rick told the truth about what happened to > > him w.r.t. Amma and the dome badge. By comparison, > > two high-ranking members of the TM organization -- > > Wallace and Pearson -- lied through their teeth, on > > at least four occasions that were quoted in the > > article. And did you miss this part: > > > > "Archer -- who says he had good experiences with > > Maharishi > > and doesn't wish the movement any ill -- doesn't > > question > > M.U.M.'s right to decide who can and can't meditate > > in the > > domes." > > > > And this one? "I feel they lose the respect of a > > lot of > > people," said Archer, "and they also box themselves > > in > > and run the risk, which I think has been to a great > > degree > > realized, of becoming very cult-like." > > > > That's all Rick said about Maharishi in the article. > > All. > > The only other times he's quoted he's talking about > > Amma. > > What he said of a factual nature was the truth, and > > what > > he said in the last section quoted above was > > opinion, > > and was clearly labeled as such. By comparison, the > > two > > TMO representatives quoted were compelled to lie. > > > > Could you please point out to me in the above quotes > > exactly where Rick spoke ill of Maharishi? Can you > > steer > > me to the section where he suggested anything > > remotely > > like "your wife is a slut and a whore?" > > > > You're running Cultthink, release 1.0, dude. It's > > old > > software, hideously outdated, and the software > > didn't > > work for shit when it was new. You're seeing things > > > > that aren't there. > > > > As I said earlier about Rick's friend, I think that > > if you examine the article, and what was actually > > said, > > what you are pissed off about is that Rick committed > > the horrible sin of telling the truth, and in > > public. > > > > Unc > > I don't see it as the "sin" of telling the truth, but > the sin of not agreeing with a particular mental > position or belief about the perfection of MMY/TMO. > MMY loves these true believers so much that he is > willing to destroy his entire movement just to burn > out these sanskaras. Is that true? I don't know, but > it is a fun possibility, isn't it. Such Divine > maddness. > >
It could be, but I don't think so. I think he is thinking that this Kali Yug is not what he is working for.....hence the Kings and Peace palaces and such like. He is saying : In full on Sat Yug, Kings will be enlightened and do only good for their people, and all people will be Brahman....ie Cosmic Admistrators (Kings). This is the whole point. He is not working for our Kali Yug thinking, or our current social systems/politics. He is working for Sat Yug no matter what. Even if it doesn't work at first, he believes that eventually it will have an effect...even a residual one 300 years from now that will grow. And if it doesn't work at all, he beleives nothing else is worth doing. This is his perception. I am not saying I believe his methodolgy will work, or will not work, but I think this is his stated methodology. off world To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
