--- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltabl...@...> 
wrote:
<snip>
> Were you trying to attack the credibility of the source,
> is that what all those "rights" about?

Just thought it was pretty funny that immediately
after you (mistakenly) dismissed the two detailed
Wikipedia articles as "put up by fans," you'd tout
a book about the case written by a close family
member of the accuser.

<snip>
> But watching your phony outrage on his behalf has been a
> hoot so thanks for that.

As I noted, the fauxtrage is yours, not mine.


Reply via email to