--- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltabl...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > Curtis is lying about my having defended Willytex. > > Of course, that doesn't bother Barry... > > From the post I was referring to:
Hmm, I wonder why Curtis didn't refer to this post: ----- --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltabl...@...>wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "WillyTex" <willytex@> wrote: > > > Not all singers are black, and not all black > > singers use Propofol. Another prejudiced statement > > from Curtis. Go figure. > > That was a shitty thing to say Richard. So was making a dumb joke about Michael Jackson's death, IMHO. ----- Hey, I think I know why Curtis didn't refer to the post quoted above--because in it I'm agreeing with Curtis's characterization of Willytex's post as being "a shitty thing to say." Not exactly a ringing defense of Willytex, is it? Instead, Curtis, having lied through his teeth, thinks he can pretend *this* was a "defense" of Willytex: > Me: > > Nice to see you pile on instead of taking Richard to task > > for his twisted accusation. > > Judy defending Richard: > I suspect he was commenting on your hypocrisy, as am I. Here I was explaining to Curtis *why* Willytex said something shitty to him, since Curtis couldn't seem to figure it out. > > Me again: > > You learn so much more about > > a person's values by what they do rather than what they say. > > I guess I should amend that since I am learning a lot about > your values from what you say Judy. Well, we've all now learned Curtis isn't above flat-out lying. (Are lies something he *does* or something he *says*? Kind of like a Zen koan, isn't it?)
