--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > -- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> > 
> > > > Judy Defending Richard
> > > > I suspect he was commenting on your hypocrisy, as am I.
> > 
> > Posting other parts of the message
> 
> I didn't post "other parts of the message." I reposted
> the first one in this exchange, the one where I'm
> agreeing with you that Willytex said something shitty:
> 
> -----
> Willytex:
> Not all singers are black, and not all black
> singers use Propofol. Another prejudiced statement
> from Curtis. Go figure.
> 
> Curtis:
> That was a shitty thing to say Richard.
> 
> Judy:
> So was making a dumb joke about Michael Jackson's
> death, IMHO.
> -----
> 
> > doesn't change your defense of Richard here Judy.
> 
> I established to start with that I thought what he
> said was shitty. Nothing I went on to say changes
> that, including your meretricious attempt to claim
> I was defending him.
> 
> > You are denying defending Richard here, do I have that
> > right Judy?
> 
> Not only that, I'm calling you on your cowardly 
> move to distract attention from your own shitty
> remarks by shifting the focus to Willytex, from
> your very first post to me in this exchange.
> 
> Go ahead, Curtis, dig yourself in deeper. It's
> quite an edifying spectacle.
>
Yep, there IS a spectacle that's been taking place for a few weeks Judy, and 
it's the one of you trying to hang in there with Curtis. Frankly it's one of 
the only reasons I look in anymore. Curtis has you hogtied every which way 
girl. Your denials of same are hysterical. You've run out of logic, down to the 
point where you're saying up is down, black is white and day is night.

If it was anyone else I'd say it was sad. But since it's you, Ms. High Horse 
herself, it's fucking funny as hell!

Reply via email to