I'm gonna say that even Judy will find these funny.
--- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltabl...@...>
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "Joe" <geezerfreak@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > ROTFL! Talk about the guilty pleasure of the year.....this is it! You're a
> > riot Judy. A sad riot admittedly, but a riot.
>
> I appreciate that you are enjoying this Joe. It is an odd exercise and I was
> sure I wore my audience out pursuing it. I'm not sure I could have hung in
> this long unless I was snowed in so long. I may have entered the twilight
> zone! There is no common ground to be gained here. But I have enjoyed the
> ride so far and if any of this makes you smile I have wasted my time a bit
> less.
>
> Here is something for people of my "class" level:
>
> Q: What's the difference between Michael Jackson and a grocery bag?
> A: One is white, made out of plastic, and dangerous for kids to play with and
> the other you carry your groceries in.
>
> Q: How can you tell if Michael Jackson has a hot date?
> A: There's a big wheel parked outside his house.
>
> Q: Why does Michael Jackson like twenty eight year olds?
> A: Because there are twenty of them.
>
> Q: Who does Michael Jackson consider a Perfect "10"?
> A: Two 5 year olds.
>
> Q: Why did Michael Jackson place a phone call to Boyz-2-Men??
> A: He thought it was a delivery service.
>
> Q: What has 18 balls and 3 pubic hairs?
> A: A Michael Jackson slumber party.
>
> Q: Did you know they're putting out a Michael Jackson stamp?
> A: Fans get to vote for the white or black Michael Jackson.
>
> Q: What's brown and often found in a baby's diaper?
> A: Michael Jackson's hand.
>
> Remember, there are all appalling and we should be ashamed!
>
>
>
>
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> > >
> > > You really are utterly contemptible, Curtis. You must
> > > be taking lessons from Barry: Lie about somebody, and
> > > when you're caught, pretend *they* were lying.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues"
> > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> > > > > > Me:
> > > > > > > Nice to see you pile on instead of taking Richard to task
> > > > > > > for his twisted accusation.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Judy defending Richard:
> > > > > > I suspect he was commenting on your hypocrisy, as am I.
> > > > >
> > > > > Here I was explaining to Curtis *why* Willytex
> > > > > said something shitty to him, since Curtis
> > > > > couldn't seem to figure it out.
> > > >
> > > > Oh not a defense,just an explaining why it would be understandable for
> > > > him to accuse me of being prejudiced for referring the the specific
> > > > manor of Michael Jackson's death.
> > > >
> > > > I'm gunna trust reasonable people to see through this obvious routine.
> > > >
> > > > 1. Accuse someone of lying about something.
> > > > 2. When evidence is presented proving that the person was not lying
> > > > post other things you said where you were not doing what the first
> > > > example proved in a transparent attempt to distract.
> > > > 3. Convince yourself other people are fooled.
> > > > 4. Repeat until the person is worn down and submits to your unfair
> > > > accusation.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Good luck with number 4.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues"
> > > > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Curtis is lying about my having defended Willytex.
> > > > > > > Of course, that doesn't bother Barry...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From the post I was referring to:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hmm, I wonder why Curtis didn't refer to this post:
> > > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues"
> > > > > <curtisdeltablues@>wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In [email protected], "WillyTex" <willytex@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Not all singers are black, and not all black
> > > > > > > singers use Propofol. Another prejudiced statement
> > > > > > > from Curtis. Go figure.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That was a shitty thing to say Richard.
> > > > >
> > > > > So was making a dumb joke about Michael Jackson's
> > > > > death, IMHO.
> > > > > -----
> > > > >
> > > > > Hey, I think I know why Curtis didn't refer to
> > > > > the post quoted above--because in it I'm agreeing
> > > > > with Curtis's characterization of Willytex's post
> > > > > as being "a shitty thing to say." Not exactly a
> > > > > ringing defense of Willytex, is it?
> > > > >
> > > > > Instead, Curtis, having lied through his teeth,
> > > > > thinks he can pretend *this* was a "defense" of
> > > > > Willytex:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Me:
> > > > > > > Nice to see you pile on instead of taking Richard to task
> > > > > > > for his twisted accusation.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Judy defending Richard:
> > > > > > I suspect he was commenting on your hypocrisy, as am I.
> > > > >
> > > > > Here I was explaining to Curtis *why* Willytex
> > > > > said something shitty to him, since Curtis
> > > > > couldn't seem to figure it out.
> > > > >
> > > > > > > Me again:
> > > > > > > You learn so much more about
> > > > > > > a person's values by what they do rather than what they say.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I guess I should amend that since I am learning a lot about
> > > > > > your values from what you say Judy.
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, we've all now learned Curtis isn't above
> > > > > flat-out lying. (Are lies something he *does* or
> > > > > something he *says*? Kind of like a Zen koan,
> > > > > isn't it?)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
