--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> , "authfriend" <jst...@...>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> , tartbrain <no_reply@> wrote:
> <snip>
> > And shows like Colbert are not the place for deep,
> > sustained analysis -- and Patel did get one point across --
> > the $200 hamburger -- which is possibly the most you can do
> > when caught in the Colbert jagurnaught roller coaster. (I
> > think Colbert is great, and he brings out great points in
> > satire -- but its not Charlie Rose.)
>
> Nope. Colbert himself (the person, not the actor)
> probably likes Patel's ideas, but he sure didn't do
> him any favors with that interview. You have to be
> both very laid-back and very quick--very in-the-moment
> and focused--to do yourself justice with Colbert. Rare
> combo, and I don't have the sense Patel makes the
> grade.>
Colbert is a jerk. He was funny one time. He is a one joke act, and it
is boring.
Now this stuff is funny:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZp6cR4bxbY
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZp6cR4bxbY>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mm-zpFZ9Z9I
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mm-zpFZ9Z9I>
OffWorld
