--- In [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> , "WillyTex" <willy...@...>
wrote:
>
> > > > However he is fervently anti-war...
> > > >
> > > Ron Paul voted 'yes' to invade Afghanistan.
> > >
> Bhairitu:
> > With the majority in 2001...
> >
> So, Ron Paul is not 'fervently' anti-war.
>

No-one said he was anti-war. I said is not a WARMONGER such as Bush.
He voted with the international community for a well co-ordinated and
rational response in Gulf War I and in Afghanisthan. He is very
rational. This is not warmongering, this is rational action based on
international consensus.
He voted against the unilateral, illegal and absolutley foolish and
irrational Iraq war which the warmngers Bush and Cheney forced through.
(Obama was also against the Iraq war.) There is a difference between
someone who supports international action in a rational and co-ordinated
unified response to an attack like in Gulf War I.
But a 'warmonger' is someone who attacks a country that has not attacked
them and thinks they can go it alone in their macho stupidity and win
and solve all problems. The latter is Bush, Cheney and you.

Ron Paul is not a warmonger. Bush/Cheney are. It is simple and obvious.

OffWorld


Reply via email to