--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], off_world_beings > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > <<(I'm kind of surprised nobody has talked about > > this, not even the smattering of women here. > > I didn't start thinking about it until just > > recently. The only mention of the nonexistent > > participation of women was when we noted the > > original "Raja So-and-So and Wife" titles on > > the photos of the couples, and the subsequent > > removal even of this reference to the women.>>> > > > > Everyone here is very blasie about this now, and it has been posted > > before. > > Naw, I've been reading all the traffic here > from the beginning of the whole Raja thing, > and I haven't seen a word except the comments > about the wives not being named in the photos. > > I'm not even talking about the *political* > aspects; we've known about the TMO's, and > MMY's, sexism for decades. I'm talking about > the practical effect of the absence of the > feminine vibe among the Rajas in terms of > whatever effect *they're* supposed to have on > world consciousness. > >
I agree. OffWorld > > Its almost like a comic book character, Superman or Spiderman > > or something. Its so stupid , you don't care anymore. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
