Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Honest answers (was comments on Gable's editorial)

[Llundrub]

> The trouble with this analysis is that it's > all black-and-white, no shades of gray. One of the problems with cult-like thinking is that it often only sees in black and white. With the program or off the program. Purity or impurity. Right technique or wrong technique. Therefore when people comment on cult-like thinking, the observations may appear black and white--but it's merely a comment on what's being seen. ---Actually your reification of 'cult-like' thinking takes place upon some assumed superior conceptual framework where 'cult-like' has some meaning.  However, viewing the situation without labels one would immediately see that there is no TMO at all, there are many diifferent people and not much in common, besides basic TM practice. People are free to reiterate whichever aspect of the 'Vedic Science' - 'SCI' - whathaveyou, as they wish. The only thing barring them is money.  Even Robin Carlson would be allowed back into the TMO if he had the bucks. So don't pretend that your view is superior as "it's merely a comment on what's being seen."  One only sees what they see, and everything else is merely conceptualization. Free your mind. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.