Edg, esoteric New Age woo-woo played a critical role in Dan's reason for 
committing suicide. In that light, I think it's understandable that those ideas 
receive their share of criticism for their role in this tragedy.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <no_re...@...> wrote:
>
> Vaj,
> 
> You could not have read my conversation with Dan and come to the conclusions 
> below.  In no way, at no time, did I validate his assertions of 
> enlightenment, in no way am I hoping for some miracle TM story to validate my 
> decades of involvement, and in no way have I tried to suggest that Dan's 
> suicide didn't have tremendously negative impacts on dozens of lives.
> 
> Edg
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradhatu@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > On Jun 3, 2010, at 10:16 AM, Duveyoung wrote:
> > 
> > > For you folks who think that Dan's suicide was crazy nuts and are  
> > > rather high strung about how New Agers are waxing on about Dan, I'm  
> > > asking if you see that that's a religious position. Meaning that  
> > > you're displaying values which, like religious values, are matters  
> > > of faith much more than fact.
> > 
> > Actually from a practical perspective, human life is precious,  
> > therefore it's not something to be wasted. You're also interrelated  
> > to other beings who, even if they don't depend on you financially,  
> > depend upon you emotionally at some heart level.
> > 
> > >
> > > I have, say, three, four, five and who knows how many more theories  
> > > about what happens after death, and given your alarm about Dan, the  
> > > atmosphere for discussion here is seriously dampened. Edification  
> > > here? Sure....
> > >
> > > Why would anyone try to get closure here with some sort of framing  
> > > about Dan that they can abide with? No matter the theory, someone  
> > > here is sure to stompsmashshit on it. This is not a healing place  
> > > now is it?
> > 
> > Suicide is generally not a healing act. The exception of course being  
> > people in terrible pain and/or a terminal illness. I do not believe  
> > either of these apply to Daniel.
> > 
> > 
> > > That's the bane of FFL -- you have to be a fool to post anything  
> > > that your heart is (perhaps temporarily yes) resonating with.
> > 
> > Or maybe you're just having a having a hard time after being sucked  
> > in by another TM Org poseur? After all, people like Dan would find  
> > their perfect target in old believers who are still clinging on to  
> > some desperate hope that some TMer out there really did benefit. TM  
> > works!  I was enlightened just like Marshy said, with a couple  
> > flourishes thrown in from some old Ramana I read!
> > 
> > Then when the rug is pulled out from that idea--unless you  
> > rationalize suicide somehow as a selfless or beneficial act--you're  
> > left to either accept the grim reality of unenligthenment, or try to  
> > rationalize it.
> >
>


Reply via email to