There are Indian millionaires who use mantras with AUM so the MMY's argument does not hold water. You will find reclusive TM practitioners too which further makes the argument not hold water. The use of AUM is called Omkara and there are many intellectual dissertations on its use (which will probably get trotted out in response to your post) but I think the real reason the mantras are given without Omkara is they tend to have a quicker effect that way though not as long lasting nor balancing. One writer on the subject, himself a son of an Indian guru, felt that TM'ers weren't very centered due to not using Omkara.
In ayurveda AUM is recommended as a balancing mantra for vata though RAM is probably a better choice for a long lasting effect. From that alone one might surmise that AUM initially calms the mind and then the shakti of the mantra following takes effect. Thomas Olson wrote: > It is my understanding that MMY advised against the use of AUM > > In any case - does anyone have knowledge re: pro & con of using AUM that they > would be willing to share? > > If anyone wishes to refer me to any resources that discuss AUM in terms of > increasing one's awareness I would be appreciative. > > Thanks > > >
