--- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <r...@...> wrote: > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of nablusoss1008 > Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 1:26 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Robes of Silk, Feet of Clay/Judith Bourque > > --- In [email protected] > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > > > From: [email protected] > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> > [mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> ] > > On Behalf Of nablusoss1008 > > Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 12:56 PM > > To: [email protected] <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Robes of Silk, Feet of Clay/Judith Bourque > > > > > --- In [email protected] > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> > > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> > > > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > > > I know nothing with certainty. > > > > > > > We know that already. > > And as you continue to develop your rumourmonging, you will know less and > > less as your lives go by. > > Thanks Nabby. My first LOL of the day. Are you going to read the book, or > do > > you consider it rumor? > > Why should I read a book by a girl only brave enough to publish it after His > passing ? > I have no idea if the story is true, but if it is I see nothing wrong in it. > Maharishi did not wear ocher robes and was free to do as He pleased. > He wore white robes, which signify bramacharya,
Which He was but for a short period in life. BTW; white robes signify a number of "things". and he claimed throughout > his life to be a lifelong celibate Is that so ? You're greatly misinformed. Not that there is anything wrong with that. You don't see something wrong with the > fact that he had numerous lovers, half his age? Not at all, so have I.
