It, I meant to type, "It was not actually done."
________________________________ From: mainstream20016 <mainstream20...@yahoo.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Mon, 12 July, 2010 9:28:25 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: A question about post limits --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <r...@...> wrote: > > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com] > On Behalf Of Alex Stanley > Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 5:41 PM > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: A question about post limits > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > > > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> > [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of Alex Stanley > > Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 5:07 PM > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: A question about post limits > > > > > > > The language is not at all clear, but it sounds like ditzy wants > > > to forward to FFL a privately emailed reply from Judy. Or publicly > > > reply to Judy's private email on FFL. > > > > > > If either of those are what he wants to do, then that would be up > > to Judy. He could ask her privately and then post them if she > > approves. > > That would amount to Judy posting by proxy, with ditzy essentially giving > away part of his allotment. I can see the potential for abuse. OTOH, few > people post enough to need such a workaround. But, it's your call, so what > the hell do I care? > > > > I see what you mean and I agree with you. Forwarding emails from people > whose allotment had expired would just be an end run around the posting > limit. So if that's what you're asking ditzy, the answer is no. Thanks, Alex and Rick for preventing posting by proxy. The 50 post / week limit prevents FFL from generating more heat than light. >
