> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
> > This time around I have noticed a commitment to keeping it > > civil and it is working for me. She isn't relating to me as > > an insane person at all so I have no complaints. It's been my observation from cursary reading, that you pretty much debated her into a corner. At this point she panics a little, and finds a reason to start on a personal attack. I also have a hard time figuring out how she can trump up these supposed bloopers of Barry's to the degree she trumps them up. I think I know the instances she is referring to, and it doesn't make a lot of sense to me if she is using this as the basis for refusing to debate Barry on what I thought was a very interesting and resonable challenge. It is one I have been thinking about the last day or so. I will say that when she has debated Ruth, that Ruth seems to be one who bails out and refuses to answer questions, going away huffing and puffing.