--- In [email protected], "Alex Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], "Llundrub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Nature making people gay is nature's way of > > controlling circumstances so that progeny are not continued > > in a certain genetic niche. So therefore one should hate > > nature which decided one was not fit to continue to > > genetically expand their frequency, instead of gays. > > The problem with that theory is that homosexuality doesn't render the > person sterile. By choice or societal pressure, homosexuals can and > do produce children. > > Alex
Also, homosexuals, by not competing for mates, still contribute to the survival of the tribe, often in a way that heterosexual males can't, due to the constant mate thing. Having a small percentage of homosexuals in a given genetic population may actually *increase* survival of that population. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
