Aurobindo was a poet and yogin, not a philosopher and certainly not a
scholar-yogin.

He carried 19th century ideas from British and Continental philosophical
idealism into his understanding of yoga. Thus he emphasized "historical
and spiritual evolution" as a way to contextualize yogic development.

His understanding of  Advaita Vedanta was misinformed and almost
pedestrian in its descriptions.

His understanding of Tantra was minimal and his comprehension of
Buddhism was so truncated it was useless.

The most unfortunate reality is that as a speaker and translator of
Classical Greek he could have read the great Neo-Platonists in their own
language, i.e. Plotinus, Iamblichus, Proclus and Damascius. It would
have widened his yogic view in a dramatic way.  However, he left them
alone … showing himself to carry within him the prejudices of his
era.

In many ways he was the consummate British-educated Indian and his
evolutionary-stratified "integral yoga" was the encoding of
these ideas.

At the individual level, he had great yogic power which he used many
times to help and heal his many disciples around the world. To describe
his yoga as "for the world" and "not for the individual"
is a bit extreme. If you have ever read his "Letters On Yoga"
then you would know how personal and committed to his disciples he was
as a guru.

He searched for the key to physical human immortality as a yogic ideal
but did not achieve any such thing. Neither did Mira.

In the end he died from kidney failure - just like so many white-rice
eating Asians.

FWIW – The Glycemic Index: Bhasmati white rice = 58 and Table sugar
= 64



****************************************************







--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, blusc0ut <no_reply@...> wrote:

> Sure. But then Sri Aurobindo did have a completely different
cosmology. For him the above view would be some kind of escapism. He
believed that his yoga was for the world, not the individual, and that
the creation of the supramental body, would be a necessary evolutionary
step toward a different kind of creation.
>




Reply via email to