Maybe: My buttons are being pushed.
Maybe: I am angry at an opinion being expressed that I don't agree with. Maybe: I resent anyone attacking the TMO. But also, Maybe: Barry has developed a blind spot that prevents him from seeing the rut he has fallen into. Naturally, I think it is the latter Maybe. But I hold out the possibility that it may be the former. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@...> wrote: > > > Here's what seems odd to me. Six weeks ago Tart posted a nice piece > about why after all this time we are still discussing these issues. > The gist was that it was to revisit the foundations on which we built > our adult lives, and to see which of the pillars were solid, and which > were shaky. And as I recall you were about the first to respond with an > enthusiastic affirmation of this process. So, has the process been > completed and now you determine that "the work has been done", and > henceforth any such efforts constitute a waste of time? Really. > > You continue to rail against the shallowness of this site, and yet you > are the number one contributor in terms of words written. How do you > square that? And what about basic courtesy or tolerance of other > people's opinions? Is it your objective to poison the site with plain > old meanness? When you first came on board, you offered what I guess > was a Buddhist perspective. That is long gone. And what is left is > just unabridged cynicism, and a lack of tolerance. But maybe everything > seems just hunky dory to you. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@ wrote: > > > > > > You are bored with being you. Everyone can understand that. > > > > And everyone can as easily understand that, as > > usual, when someone says something you don't like, > > you drop into "attack mode." :-) > > > > I repeat my contention. No one on planet Earth > > gives a shit whether what Maharishi said and did > > was "in accord with the laws of nature" or not, > > or whether he was enlightened or not, except for > > people trying to justify their years (and tens of > > thousands of dollars) of investment in him. T'would > > seem you're one of those people, so to you debating > > the subject endlessly is not boring. To me, it is. > > > > > Whether you are bored is not relevant to any conversation > > > between any two people on this forum. Your presence here > > > is just a way to insert your comments without cause. > > > > Absolutely. And? > > > > Oh. I forgot. You don't like people being able to > > make comments you don't agree with. :-) > > > > > Go back to the nothingness of you and enjoy it ... just as > > > we enjoy your absence and your consequent irrelevance. > > > > We? Is that a vajra in your pocket, or are you > > glad to see me? :-) > > > > > With all due respect. > > > > Uh-huh. :-) > > > > I generally ignore anything you say, Empt. Might > > I suggest you just do the same with what I say? > > As much as you don't like the fact, I have the > > right to say anything I want. Here, or elsewhere. > > > > > ***************************************** > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > With all due respect, you're back to one of the > > > > BORING arguments on FFL. > > > > > > > > Who, after all, really cares, except for a few > > > > people still trying to justify their investment > > > > of time, money, and belief for all those years? > > > > Maharishi's dead, and it looks as if his movement > > > > will be as well in a few years, maybe sooner. No > > > > one else on the planet gives a shit. > > > > > > > > > >
