--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "whynotnow7" <whynotnow7@> wrote: > > > > > > Agreed. Turq has been an unremitting jerk to many on here > > > for awhile; insulting and intolerant. People grow tired of > > > it and this is the result. It would be the same if any of > > > us acted that way. Has nothing at all to do with TM or > > > whether or not the gunas act invisibly or whether or not > > > Maharishi is enlightened. Turq is just being a mean jerk > > > and this is the result. What did he expect, accolades? :-) > > > > The proof that it's Barry's exceedingly unpleasant behavior, > > rather than his negative views of TM, that attracts so much > > criticism is that there are many others here who express > > equally negative views of TM who don't get criticized to > > anywhere near the extent he does, if at all. They're able > > to express their views without poisonous insults and mean > > putdowns of those who hold different opinions. > > P.S.: If you go back and look at Barry's initial post > this morning on whether MMY was enlightened, you'll find > that it didn't contain insults or putdowns. It wasn't > "mean," just skeptical. So he can express himself > relatively pleasantly when he wants to.
Nice comment and observation Judy, HIS comments were fair game after all.
