Here's what seems odd to me. Six weeks ago Tart posted a nice piece about why after all this time we are still discussing these issues. The gist was that it was to revisit the foundations on which we built our adult lives, and to see which of the pillars were solid, and which were shaky. And as I recall you were about the first to respond with an enthusiastic affirmation of this process. So, has the process been completed and now you determine that "the work has been done", and henceforth any such efforts constitute a waste of time? Really.
You continue to rail against the shallowness of this site, and yet you are the number one contributor in terms of words written. How do you square that? And what about basic courtesy or tolerance of other people's opinions? Is it your objective to poison the site with plain old meanness? When you first came on board, you offered what I guess was a Buddhist perspective. That is long gone. And what is left is just unabridged cynicism, and a lack of tolerance. But maybe everything seems just hunky dory to you. --- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "emptybill" emptybill@ wrote: > > > > You are bored with being you. Everyone can understand that. > > And everyone can as easily understand that, as > usual, when someone says something you don't like, > you drop into "attack mode." :-) > > I repeat my contention. No one on planet Earth > gives a shit whether what Maharishi said and did > was "in accord with the laws of nature" or not, > or whether he was enlightened or not, except for > people trying to justify their years (and tens of > thousands of dollars) of investment in him. T'would > seem you're one of those people, so to you debating > the subject endlessly is not boring. To me, it is. > > > Whether you are bored is not relevant to any conversation > > between any two people on this forum. Your presence here > > is just a way to insert your comments without cause. > > Absolutely. And? > > Oh. I forgot. You don't like people being able to > make comments you don't agree with. :-) > > > Go back to the nothingness of you and enjoy it ... just as > > we enjoy your absence and your consequent irrelevance. > > We? Is that a vajra in your pocket, or are you > glad to see me? :-) > > > With all due respect. > > Uh-huh. :-) > > I generally ignore anything you say, Empt. Might > I suggest you just do the same with what I say? > As much as you don't like the fact, I have the > right to say anything I want. Here, or elsewhere. > > > ***************************************** > > > > --- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > With all due respect, you're back to one of the > > > BORING arguments on FFL. > > > > > > Who, after all, really cares, except for a few > > > people still trying to justify their investment > > > of time, money, and belief for all those years? > > > Maharishi's dead, and it looks as if his movement > > > will be as well in a few years, maybe sooner. No > > > one else on the planet gives a shit. > > > > > >
