> > This has little to do with where President Obama 
> > was born...And much to do with unadulterated racism...
> > Plain and simple.
> >
Rick Archer: 
> It's ALWAYS been about having a black man as President,
> 
So, for you it is a race question, not a birth question?

The birth certificate says Obama is an 'African'. What 
race is that? LoL!

"At a magnification level of 400%, there is a distinct 
area of pure white with no pattern directly adjacent to, 
and surrounding each and every typed character (halos). 
This same no-pattern area of pure white is adjacent to, 
and surrounds all of the script handwriting on the document 
(more halos). 

The security background pattern would be continuous and
merge with the edge lines of the typed characters and 
the handwritten lines. The typed characters and the 
handwriting were "layered in" on the background of a 
different document. 

The metadata for the file states it was created with MAC 
OSX 10.6.7. They failed to merge and blend the document 
security pattern into the layered typed characters and 
handwriting when they were placed upon the background 
layer. 

Mechanical typewriters of that era have a distinct 
vertical alignment issue which causes capital letters to 
be aligned above the level of the small letters, and if 
the same letter is struck consecutively as a capital and 
then a small letter, the small letter then shows a 
tendency to be placed slightly above the level of the 
other small letters subsequently typed after the two same 
letters. 

There are gross inconsistencies with certain letters 
being out of vertical alignment at random places in several 
words, i.e. "a" in "African", the second "o" in "Honolulu, 
Hawaii." 

Not being a handwriting expert, the similarity in the 
handwritten dates of "8-7-61" and "8-8-61" are far too 
uncanny to be a coincidence. The dashes in both dates slant 
upward to the right, and the "61" looks identical in both 
dates. Both dates slant identically to the right at almost 
an identical angle. These two dates were supposedly written 
by two completely
different hands, as the signatures show, on different days. 

If this is a 50-year old document, where is: natural 
discoloration of the paper; the natural migration of the 
handwriting ink; wear of the background security pattern 
from handling; and usual edge wear on a fifty-year old 
paper document?" 

http://tinyurl.com/3q7pclc

Reply via email to