The quote below isn't from the URL Willytex gives either. Apparently he's just making stuff up, putting it in quotes, and then adding the URL to any old page about the birth certificate to make it appear that what he wrote comes from a credible source.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" <willytex@...> wrote: > > > > > > This has little to do with where President Obama > > > was born...And much to do with unadulterated racism... > > > Plain and simple. > > > > Rick Archer: > > It's ALWAYS been about having a black man as President, > > > So, for you it is a race question, not a birth question? > > The birth certificate says Obama is an 'African'. What > race is that? LoL! > > "At a magnification level of 400%, there is a distinct > area of pure white with no pattern directly adjacent to, > and surrounding each and every typed character (halos). > This same no-pattern area of pure white is adjacent to, > and surrounds all of the script handwriting on the document > (more halos). > > The security background pattern would be continuous and > merge with the edge lines of the typed characters and > the handwritten lines. The typed characters and the > handwriting were "layered in" on the background of a > different document. > > The metadata for the file states it was created with MAC > OSX 10.6.7. They failed to merge and blend the document > security pattern into the layered typed characters and > handwriting when they were placed upon the background > layer. > > Mechanical typewriters of that era have a distinct > vertical alignment issue which causes capital letters to > be aligned above the level of the small letters, and if > the same letter is struck consecutively as a capital and > then a small letter, the small letter then shows a > tendency to be placed slightly above the level of the > other small letters subsequently typed after the two same > letters. > > There are gross inconsistencies with certain letters > being out of vertical alignment at random places in several > words, i.e. "a" in "African", the second "o" in "Honolulu, > Hawaii." > > Not being a handwriting expert, the similarity in the > handwritten dates of "8-7-61" and "8-8-61" are far too > uncanny to be a coincidence. The dashes in both dates slant > upward to the right, and the "61" looks identical in both > dates. Both dates slant identically to the right at almost > an identical angle. These two dates were supposedly written > by two completely > different hands, as the signatures show, on different days. > > If this is a 50-year old document, where is: natural > discoloration of the paper; the natural migration of the > handwriting ink; wear of the background security pattern > from handling; and usual edge wear on a fifty-year old > paper document?" > > http://tinyurl.com/3q7pclc >
