Are you familiar with Eprime?  I am familiar with it only from what
a friend of mine has told me about it, but it reminds me a bit of
your "obnosis".

As I understand it, eprime is a way of speaking that eliminates the
word "is" because -- like your illustration of the ear lobe and the
ear -- it is inaccurate for anyone to claim that something "is" when
all they are doing is observing something and can't claim to know
the reality.

For example, I see my drinking cup on the desk in front of my
computer.  According to my understanding of Eprime, it is incorrect
for me to say "the cup in on the table" but correct to say "the cup
appears in my vision resting on the table".

Eprime and "obnosis" reminds me of the accuracy with which lawyers
require language to be when people are on the witness stand which
disallows things like hearsay or what appears to be "expert
testimony" from a layman.
 
----It's interesting but I studied Roland Barthes and Jacques Derrida in college and understand the deconstruction of all language.  No new language can bridge the basic communication gap of differing experience.



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to