--- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote:
> What's good for the goose is good for the gander. > Steve (seventhray1) will probably believe Jim, and > will feel no need to check out Jim's "facts," just > as he felt no need to check on Richard Nelson's. So, > undoubtedly, will the rest of the "pile on" crowd. > But I'm thinkin' a little proof is in order. Apart from this issue, you weigh the credibility of sources just as I do, just as anyone does. But you may not be aware of this annoying habit you have of denigrating sources or opinions you happen to disagree with. You do it the name of busting boundries. Hey that sounds pretty good, "Barry The Boundry Buster". Even kind of manly.
