Excellent analysis and right on spot as usual, Turq is an excellent writer but it's such a pity because all we see in his posts are either bullying, victim-hood or various other projections of his emotional pain involved with the Rama Cult.
--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], tartbrain <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Aside from a few sociopaths and/or trolls, I suspect that > > > > you can make the claim that everyone who bothers to post > > > > on the internet has some stake in what they are talking > > > > about. > > > > > > True. Otherwise why take the time to post it. > > > > I am going to disagree with both sparaig and tartbrain > > here...respectfully...by pointing out that their argument > > may be based on the writer's feelings about the writing > > process. > > > > I write for a living. I am a fast enough typist so that > > there is almost no lag between what I think and it appear- > > ing onscreen as text. So I do it for fun. It's a way of > > concretizing the abstract ideas that flit through my mind, > > to see whether they have any lasting meaning for me other > > than as Just Another Flit-Thought. > > Trouble is, the ideas that flit through your mind and > make it into your posts here are generally of pretty > low quality. They're very often shallow, unfocused, > and lacking in logic, insight, and above all, self- > knowledge. > > The one you made today about "equality" is a good > example. Not only did it make little sense because > you didn't think through the different meanings of > "equality" in different contexts, it showed your > typical inability to recognize that you were > demonstrating the same behavior you were criticizing. > > I don't know whether you'd be capable of better work > if you took more time with what you write, but your > slapdash way of recording and then posting your > ideas doesn't reflect well on you either as a thinker > or as a writer. It also reveals your contempt for > your audience that you throw together posts with so > little thought. >
