true, but one doesn't have to know Skt or Hebrew in order to meet them. English 
works well.
http://www.feebleminds-gifs.com/emerald-butterfly.jpg



--- In [email protected], "emptybill" <emptybill@...> wrote:
>
> Angels are merely a Semitic notion.
> 
> There are no "angels" in the Veda-s, Purana-s or Tantra-s.
> 
> "Angelos" means "messenger" in Greek, in other words
> a news-bearer -  not even a messenger of a "god".
> 
> In Hebrew, "mal'akh yhvh" means "messenger of yhvh.
> That is all.
> 
> Fergit the notion that deva-s are "angels". T'aint so.
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Yifu" <yifuxero@> wrote:
> >
> > You're obscuring the issues by conflating "brains" with subtle nervous
> systems. In ordinary every day parlance, Angels are considered not
> having BRAINS (physical nervous systems)...and don't bring up the
> Biblical statement about physically embodied Angels.
> > ...
> > It's obvious that Angels may have subtle nervous systems. I've met
> Raphael the Archangel. He has a body but it's not physical, thus no
> brains.
> > ...
> > Several people have asked MMY questions regarding existence after
> physical life, pertaining to subtle nervous systems. Such "systems" = a
> larger set than "brains", which operate on our physical world.
> > ...
> > Again, some people believe that if one is close to Enlightenment, the
> goal may be attained without a physical body; through various Sadhanas
> of unknown nature. But the idea that people "must" have physical bodies
> is heresay, as is the counter proposition. But more options appeals to
> me as an idea.
> > ...
> > http://www.feebleminds-gifs.com/celeste.jpg
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" LEnglish5@ wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > [...]
> > > > Yeah, exactly. If individual brains produce individual
> > > > consciousnesses, you have to do some fairly elaborate
> > > > acrobatics to speak of Consciousness. MMY was definitely
> > > > an Idealist (matter is emergent from consciousness)
> > > > rather than a Materialist (vice-versa).
> > >
> > > There's no fracking difference guys! How can you miss this?
> > >
> > >
> > > L.
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to